- The authors:
- Issue: July 24-26th, 2019
- Pages: 45-50
- Section: EVALUATION METHODS AND VISUAL APPROACHES IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS
- URL: http://conference-ifl.rudn.ru/45-50/
Abstract. Visual methods are often marginalized in educational research and have not been employed to collect information about the co -existence of multiple cultures in schools and their influence on the students, eachers and the responding community. The aim of this presentation is to use isual methods for understanding the culture of schools and how images/visual messages formal or informal are perceived, processed by high school students in Greece and the extend of intergrading and acknowledging diversity of the examined school units. It reports on a participative esearch project in four secondary schools in Greece from distinctively different cultural and economic backgrounds. The strategy of research applied in this study is grounded theory and the qualitative methods of research are: structured interviews (4 interviews done and transcribed during one month), scaled questionnaires were distributed (80 done during one month and transcribed) and photography (800 photos done during one month and described) and repeated visits in schools. There were at least 80 students involved at the project during one month. Moreover this presentation draws on content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents/visual messages obtained or generated in the course of research. Finally the presentation will conclude that these approaches provide a comprehensive view of how visual images are produced and interpreted, and of what their potential social consequences may be. The use of visual methods is not without challenges however. Securing ethics approval and school participation along with problems with camera retrieval and protecting participant agency were some difficulties encountered in the current study. For those wishing to pursue less conventional research methodologies in educational settings, this presentation will also highlight potential benefits and struggles.
Keywords: visual signs, content analysis, multiculturalism, cultural nalysis
Sofia Tsagdi 1, Konstantinos Theologou 2
1 National and Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece,
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9515-7283
2 National and Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece,
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3883-601X
Alderson, Priscilla and Jonathan Montgomery. 1996. Health Care Choices: Making Decisions with Children. London: Institute for Public Policy, 101pp.
Allen, L. 2009. Caught in the act: Ethics committee review and researching the sexual culture of schools. Qualitative Research 9(4): 1–16.
Bragg, Sara. 2007. “Student Voice” and Governmentality: The production of enterprising subjects? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28(3): 343–358. doi:10.1080/01596300701458905 Cook-Sather, Alison. 2014. The trajectory of student voice in educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 49(2): 131–148.
Cremin, Hilary and Barbara Slatter. 2004. Is it possible to access the voice of pre-schoolchildren? Results of a research project in a pre-school setting.
Educational Studies30(4): 457–470. doi:10.1080/0305569042000310363 Denis, M., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1999) Visual mental imagery and visual perception: Structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes. Memory and Cognition 36(4): 849–862.
Emmison, M., and P. Smith. 2000. Researching the visual: Images, objects, contexts and interactions in social and cultural inquiry. London: Sage Fielding, Michael. 2004. ‘New Wave’ student voice and renewal of civic society. London Review of Education 2(3):197-217.
Gunther R. Kress, Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 312 pp.
Halpin, A. W., and D. B. Croft. 1963. The organizational climate of schools.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 130 pp.
Hart, Roger A. 1997. Children’s Participation in Sustainable Development.
Abingdon: Earthscan, 208 pp.
Hill, Malcolm. 2006. Children’s voices on ways of having a voice: children and young people’s perspectives on methods used in research and consultation. Childhood 13(1): 69–89. doi:10.1177/0907568206059972 Allison, James, Chris Jenks, and Alan Prout. 1998. Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press, 247 pp.
Jewitt, C., and R. Oyama. 2001. Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In Handbook of Visual analysis, edited by Theo van Leeuwen and Carey Jewitt. London: Sage, pp. 134-156.
Kalantzis, Mary and Bill Cope. 2008. New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 261 pp.